Faculty Researchers And Non-Researchers In The Context Of Teaching Performance And Personal Profile
Every Higher Education Institution needs to develop faculty researchers from its faculty line up who can share
their time and expertise to produce research outputs while performing their responsibilities as classroom teachers and
sometimes as school managers. This study aims to compare the result of faculty performance evaluation from students and the
faculty profile when they are categorized based on their research involvement. Descriptive type of research method with
inferential statistics using Chi-square test and Guttman’s Coefficient of predictability as statistical tools was utilized to
describe the result of the study. Results showed that there are more female master’s degree holders with hourly rate from Php
251 to 350 who have active research involvement than males and bachelor’s degree and doctorate degree holders. Faculty
researchers have significantly higher performance evaluation rating from the students compared to non-researchers. Those
with higher Instructional and Diagnostic expertise among faculty members showed higher possibility of becoming faculty
researcher. Faculty members may also be required to write books or instructional manuals as a form of research output. If they
will be written their own material to be utilized in their own respective classes, mastery or the subject expertise may be fully
achieved. They were encouraged to conduct more funded researches from the government and private agencies during the
transition period of the Philippine Education in the K-12 implementation.
Index Terms— Faculty Member, Researcher, Non-Researcher, Teaching Performance.